Flying T Ranch v. Stillaguamish Tribe

Flying T Ranch v. Stillaguamish Tribe enters the Domination Chronicles conversation through a Washington Supreme Court concurrence that criticizes racist language in foundational federal Indian law cases. That criticism matters, but the episode asks whether changing the language is enough when the legal structure remains in place.

The case becomes a way to examine the difference between denouncing offensive rhetoric and challenging the doctrines that made the rhetoric legally effective. Courts can distance themselves from older words while continuing to rely on assumptions of discovery, conquest, and domination. Newcomb and d’Errico use the case to press for a deeper reading: the problem is not only what courts once said about Native nations, but the claimed authority those courts continue to exercise over peoples who never surrendered their original freedom and independence.

Direct link