Halverson v. Burgum
Halverson v. Burgum appears in Domination Chronicles as a contemporary example of how older legal claims continue to operate in present-day court decisions. The case involved Jack Halverson, a citizen of the Crow Nation, and his attempt to bring a claim involving the Bureau of Indian Affairs. The Ninth Circuit dismissed the case on sovereign immunity grounds.
What makes the case important for this project is not only the procedural result. It is the way the decision reaches back to Johnson v. McIntosh and the inherited claim that Christian discovery gave the United States authority over Native lands and peoples. The Domination Chronicles discussion asks readers and listeners to notice how domination persists through ordinary legal reasoning. A modern dismissal can sound technical while still carrying forward a much older structure of assumed U.S. control.
SUGGESTED CITATION
Adam DJ Brett, "Halverson v. Burgum," Doctrine of Discovery Project (19 November 2025), https://doctrineofdiscovery.org/blog/link/halverson-v-burgum/.
Download citation formats:
Share on
X Facebook LinkedIn BlueskyDonate today!
Open Access educational resources cost money to produce. Please join the growing number of people supporting The Doctrine of Discovery so we can sustain this work. Please give today.