Repudiations
Repuidations of the Doctrine of Discovery by religious organizations and faith communities
Recent posts
The Monroe Doctrine (1823) - Domination Translator Series - Part 6 Permalink
“The Monroe Doctrine (1823) Domination Translator Series Part 6,” an Outcome archive entry by Steven T. Newcomb. The entry belongs to the featured collection...
The Marshall Trilogy: Worcester v. Georgia (1832) - Domination Translator Series - Part 5
The 1832 Worcester v. Georgia ruling protected Native nations from state laws, yet affirmed federal domination under the Doctrine of Discovery.
The Marshall Trilogy: Worcester v. Georgia (1832) - Domination Translator Series - Part 5 Permalink
“The Marshall Trilogy: Worcester v. Georgia (1832) Domination Translator Series Part 5,” an Outcome archive entry by Steven T. Newcomb. The entry belongs to ...
The Marshall Trilogy: Cherokee Nation v. Georgia (1831) - Domination Translator Series - Part 4
In 1831, the Cherokee Nation sought Supreme Court protection from Georgia’s laws designed to annihilate their political existence.
The Marshall Trilogy: Cherokee Nation v. Georgia (1831) - Domination Translator Series - Part 4 Permalink
“The Marshall Trilogy: Cherokee Nation v. Georgia (1831) Domination Translator Series Part 4,” an Outcome archive entry by Steven T. Newcomb. The entry belon...
The Marshall Trilogy: Johnson v. McIntosh, 21 U.S. (8 Wheat.) 543 (1823) - Domination Translator Series - Part 3
The 1823 landmark Johnson v. McIntosh case established the Doctrine of Discovery as U.S. law, denying Native nations’ property rights.
The Marshall Trilogy: Johnson v. McIntosh, 21 U.S. (8 Wheat.) 543 (1823) - Domination Translator Series - Part 3 Permalink
“The Marshall Trilogy: Johnson v. McIntosh, 21 U.S. (8 Wheat.) 543 (1823) Domination Translator,” an Outcome archive entry by Steven T. Newcomb. The entry be...
Fletcher v. Peck (1810) - Domination Translator Series - Part 2
The Fletcher v. Peck case examined whether the U.S. courts would recognize Indian title to land, and how colonial charters justified domination.
Fletcher v. Peck (1810) - Domination Translator Series - Part 2 Permalink
“Fletcher v. Peck (1810) Domination Translator Series Part 2,” an Outcome archive entry by Steven T. Newcomb. The entry belongs to the featured collection an...
The Domination Translator Series: An Extended Essay on Various U.S. Supreme Court Rulings and Other Topics - Part 1
How did the U.S. justify ‘ultimate dominion’ over Native nations and lands? This series examines the Doctrine of Discovery in Supreme Court rulings.
The Domination Translator Series - Complete Index Permalink
“The Domination Translator Series Complete Index,” an Outcome archive entry by Steven T. Newcomb. The entry belongs to the featured collection and connects r...
The Domination Translator Series: An Extended Essay on Various U.S. Supreme Court Rulings and Other Topics - Part 1 Permalink
“The Domination Translator Series: An Extended Essay on Various U.S. Supreme Court Rulings and,” an Outcome archive entry by Steven T. Newcomb. The entry bel...
Examining the Doctrine of Discovery in Religion and Indigenous Studies Permalink
Abstract Since the publication of Pagans in the Promised Land by Steven T. Newcomb (Shawnee/Lenape), scholarship on the Doctrine of Discovery has expanded si...
Domination Chronicles: Pulp Legal Fiction - Tee-Hit-Ton v. United States Permalink
In this episode, Newcomb and d’Errico revisit Tee-Hit-Ton Indians v. United States, the 1955 Supreme Court decision that denied compensation for timber taken...
Domination Chronicles: McGirt v. Oklahoma - Revealing and Concealing Domination Permalink
The Supreme Court’s decision in McGirt v. Oklahoma was widely celebrated as a win for the Creek Nation. In this episode, Newcomb and d’Errico ask a more diff...